Share This Article with a Friend!


The George H.W. Bush Obituary You Won’t Read In The New York Times (Part One)

George H. W. Bush’s relationship with conservatives may be best illustrated by his response to a CBS television interview Howard Phillips and I had with Dan Rather at the 1984 Republican National Convention.

We pounded Bush for his lack of commitment to conservative principles and what we saw as his “inside the White House” fifth column against Reaganism.

GW Bush oath of officeThe following evening, Rather interviewed Bush and said in so many words, “Mr. Vice President, last night I had Richard Viguerie and Howard Phillips on the show, and they say you’re not a conservative. Mr. Vice President, are you a conservative?” Bush replied, “Yes, Dan, I’m a conservative, but I’m not a nut about it.”

I’m proud to say that I was then and am now a “nut” about liberty. It was later shown that what George H. W. Bush was a nut about was growing government, and driving all conservatives out of the White House, the executive branch of the federal government, and the Republican Party.

Mr. Bush’s lengthy resume was accumulated largely by being selected for posts by his establishment friends and those with whom he allied himself – he was never an agent of conservative change, rather, he was a stabilizing force to keep government aligned with establishment goals.

Nowhere was this more evident than in his influence on President Ronald Reagan and the Reagan White House.

As I explained in my book TAKEOVER, as Vice President, George H. W. Bush came to the White House with an extensive Rolodex of progressive establishment Republican friends and contacts whom he worked hard to place in key positions in the government—starting with his campaign manager and fellow Texan, James Baker, as chief of staff at the White House. With Jim Baker in that key role, it became that much harder to place movement conservatives in other policy-making positions in the government.

Vice President Bush, Senator Howard Baker, Congressman Bob Michel, and the rest of the establishment Republicans in Washington weren’t necessarily bad people, but their lack of commitment to the conservative principles that Reagan ran on, and that grassroots conservatives expected the GOP to deliver on, meant that the debate that went on in the Republican primaries between Big Government Republicans and the Reaganites who wanted to shrink government never really ended.

However, it is a tribute to Bush’s political instincts (or perhaps more correctly the political instincts of the late Lee Atwater) that while George H.W. Bush was no conservative, to win the presidency he was more than happy to run as a conservative.

In 1988 George H.W. Bush ran what was arguably one of the most conservative campaigns for President of the modern era.

From the Second Amendment to American exceptionalism to the right to life that Bush had once opposed by backing Roe v. Wade and abortion on demand, George H. W. Bush hit all the notes conservatives were hoping to hear from the Republican presidential candidate and emphasized the social issues establishment Republicans always do their best to avoid.

Absent the acceptance speeches of Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan, I doubt there was ever a more conservative acceptance speech delivered at a Republican National Convention. Many of the voters who voted for Bush based on his acceptance speech didn’t realize it, but they were voting for speechwriter (now Wall Street Journal columnist) Peggy Noonan, not George H. W. Bush. And the fiscal conservatives and small-government-types were particularly cheered when their newly nominated Republican candidate for president, George H. W. Bush, said:

And I’m the one who will not raise taxes. My opponent . . . my opponent now says . . . my opponent now says he’ll raise them as a last resort, or a third resort. But when a politician talks like that, you know that’s one resort he’ll be checking into. My opponent won’t rule out raising taxes. But I will. And the Congress will push me to raise taxes, and I’ll say no, and they’ll push, and I’ll say no, and they’ll push again, and I’ll say, to them, “Read my lips: no new taxes.”

George H.W. Bush, running for the third term of Ronald Reagan would handily win the 1988 election, but that line, “Read my lips: no new taxes,” and George H.W. Bush’s lack of commitment to the principles behind it, would be the rock upon which his presidency would founder.

Tomorrow: The George H.W. Bush Obituary You Won’t Read In The New York Times (Part Two)

Share this

Brought Ross Perot into the fray

This is the first honest obituary I've read. It's precisely because H. W. ran as a conservative but administered as a liberal that Ross Perot was able to enter the 1992 election and siphon off 20 percent or so of the voters, including me, who would have voted Republican. Thanks to George H. W. Bush, we got the serial rapist for the next eight years. Bush was a nice guy, but way out of his league as president.

George Was There!

 “It was only by playing up ideology and assuming the mantle of Ronald Reagan that George Bush could hope to defeat Michael Dukakis. Conservatives were well advised to question the sincerity of Bush’s ‘conversion’ to the conservatism that Reagan espoused, and Bush rejected, during their campaigns for the Republican nomination in 1980.”My commentary on the 1988 Republican Convention: http://www.politickles.com/bobliography/articles/rnc88.pdf

Unread Bush obituary

Great points. H. Bush, as with all the Bushs, was NWO. His father Prescott was a Manhatten banker for the Nazis. Sort of an early version of NWO, I suppose. H.Bush even routinely touted his favorite logo "It's a new world order." Having a former CIA director as President is a bit like giving Pol Pot the Nobel Peace Prize. Mr. Viguerie carefully walks around the unmitigated coverup of the Kennedy assassination. Or the presence of H. Bush in Dallas that fateful day. But let us be honest. As a CINO's, both H. and W. Bush were masters of double talk. 

the truth will set you free all worldly people seek Jesus

without fake news from the worldly media there is hope. remember discernment is imperative for honor and integrity