Printer-friendly versionSend to friend

Santorum and Paul Won the Last Debate

By CHQ Staff | 1/30/12

That’s the verdict of our CHQ Poll respondents, who obviously did not care for the performances of the two “top” candidates who hogged the debate time with their personal attacks on each other.

We asked you:  “Who do you believe won the Republican presidential debate Thursday night?  We’re not asking who you support.  Rather, which candidate did the most to advance his candidacy Thursday night?

Here is how you responded:

36%  Rick Santorum

36%  Ron Paul

17%  Newt Gingrich

10%  Mitt Romney

The two “top” candidates might bear these results in mind in future debates.  The media love slugfest entertainment.  Conservative activists want substance.

The Council on Foreign

Submitted by clarencejaeger on Mon, 01/30/2012 - 23:06.
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is the Rockefeller organized think thank for the New World Order. They have long bragged that if any organization becomes a problem they can have their people, with the help of the controlled news media, infiltrate, destroy or neutralize any organization. It appears the Tea Party is no exception being their overwhelming support of Gingrich. Gingrich is a longtime member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Gingrich never saw a globalist agenda-item that he did not enthusiastically support such as: NAFTA, GATT, the WTO, FTAA, the North American Union (by whatever name it’s called at the moment), the NAFTA Superhighway, ad infinitum. Gingrich is as much committed to open borders as is Bill Clinton, Al Gore, or Barack Obama. Gingrich is as committed to the advancement of the George Soros-sponsored Agenda 21 “green” initiatives as any person living today. Ron Paul may benefit from the small Tea Parterres.

More of the Same

Submitted by emmettsmith on Mon, 01/30/2012 - 14:20.

The mastersx chuckle as thet watch us bicker over our choice Newt or Mitt because thery are the same andthere actually is no choice. Neither one of them will strive to return this country to the people or remove it from the corporate hands that run it. The masters will smile as the take either Newt or Mitt and remain happy and in control.

media controlled debate

Submitted by Joseph C Moore-... on Mon, 01/30/2012 - 14:06.

Absolutely true that the media cares little about substance but prods rather toward sensationalism.  The electorate is looking for substantive answers about presidential leadership, not for an innocuous brawl between the candidates goaded by the liberal moderators.  We already know what they have done and are ready to overlook their warts of personal life and past performance if we can now find them believable in their rhetoric.  Personally, I find the steadfast adherence to the constitution of Congressman Paul, the most appealing.

I say let them destroy each

Submitted by drmaddogs on Mon, 01/30/2012 - 13:11.

I say let them destroy each other. It exposes them for what they are and how they will deal with others.Our, or any system of governing is a power struggle. Everytime there is a downturn an opportunity exists for Politicians whom are willing to do, or say anything to avail themselves of desperate yearnings in the populace.Without these Pathological leanings exposed to the voters from Politiians willing to expose their fundemntal shortcomings the voters will never know just how balanced those candidates are in approaching opponets.Foriegn or Domestic

I for one do nor believe these behavior weaknesses are turned off once elected.