Share This Article with a Friend!

UN hypocrisy versus the Second Amendment

It is no secret that many liberals and Democrats, from President Obama to local mayors and city councilmen, would like to eviscerate the Second Amendment to the Constitution that protects Americans’ right to keep and bear arms.

UN Gun ControlIndeed, given Attorney General Eric Holder’s known antipathy to the Second Amendment, some have suggested that the failed Fast and Furious gun smuggling sting that led to the death of Agent Brian Terry was approved in some measure because it would cast Second Amendment rights in a bad light and lead to public pressure for more firearms regulation.

While it seems anything is possible in the inside-out world of the Obama administration, we need not join Fast and Furious conspiracy theorists to find a more real and present danger to Americans’ Second Amendment rights in the policies of the Obama administration.

According to FOX News, the Obama administration is in talks at the UN “on the final wording of the so-called Arms Trade Treaty, which supporters such as Amnesty International USA say would rein in unregulated weapons that kill an estimated 1,500 people daily around the world.”

However, Second Amendment advocates, including the National Rifle Association’s Wayne LaPierre, warn the treaty would mark a major step toward the eventual erosion of the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment gun-ownership rights.

The hypocrisy of the UN on such matters is such that Iran has been appointed to a key role in the talks, even as Tehran stands accused by the UN of arming Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's bloody crackdown on freedom fighters.

While there are a host of troubling foreign policy implications in the proposed treaty, its real flaw in the eyes of those concerned about protecting the freedom our Constitution guarantees is how it changes the relationship between government and citizens.

As National Rifle Association executive vice president Wayne LaPierre noted, under the proposed treaty, “If you’re the government, you get the guns, if you’re a civilian, you don’t. But this will just end up helping evil governments and tyrants.”

LaPierre has nailed more than just the flaw in the proposed UN small arms treaty; he has hit upon the hypocrisy at the heart of liberal opposition to Second Amendment rights.

Liberals, such as President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder, don’t object to guns in general -- they only object to guns that the government doesn’t own or control. The revolutionaries who wrote our Constitution knew, as freedom fighters in Libya and Syria have shown in the present day, that giving government a monopoly on gun ownership is the first action tyrants will take to preserve their power.

Those interested in preserving the freedom our revolutionary forefathers bequeathed us will oppose this backdoor attempt by the Obama administration to undo the Second Amendment.

Share this

The UN Plans to Ban American Civillian's Guns - Update


Proof: UN Plans To Ban American Guns - Update

This is very serious and pressing!

July 14, 2012

Globalist United Nations moving to undermine and kill off Second Amendment. See more in Alex’s addendum and even more evidence/explanation of the gun ban intent.


Additional Video News Clip Added, The UN is really digging in hard going after Civillian American guns!

And:: Emergency Alert! UN Set To Ban Civilian Gun Ownership 

Sterilization and Eugenics Courtesy of Obama and the UN


They Want To Sterilize American Women: Sterilization Won’t Cost Women A Penny Under Obamacare


Michael Snyder

The American Dream

July 13, 2012

Did you know that sterilization will not cost women a penny under Obamacare? A new regulation that goes into effect on August 1st requires that health plans cover sterilization for all women with “reproductive capacity”.


That includes teenage girls. According to the new regulation, women must have access to sterilization “without having to pay a co-payment, co-insurance or a deductible.” So women will not have to pay a single penny out of pocket if they want to get sterilized. Of course this sterilization mandate will make health insurance more expensive for all of us, but the social engineers in Washington D.C. feel that increasing access to sterilization is a very important public policy goal. So why are they doing this? They are doing this because they love death. They truly believe that they are saving the planet by reducing human numbers. That is why “family planning” is always at the very heart of the “green agenda”. They want to sterilize women because that will help keep the population down. And if there are less people running around, there will be less of us to ruin “their planet” with all of our pollution.

The new Obamacare regulation requires health insurance policies to offer 100% coverage for all “approved contraceptive methods, sterilization procedures, and patient education and counseling for all women with reproductive capacity.”

But to fully understand what is going on, you have to look at this in context with what is being implemented all over the globe.

Have you heard of Agenda 21? It is an international effort coordinated by the United Nations to make the world a more “sustainable” place in the 21st century.

To the social engineers at the forefront of this effort, the number one threat to “sustainable development” is overpopulation. That is why population control is one of the central pillars of Agenda 21.

So all over the globe, family planning programs are being pushed and funded by the United Nations. In many UN-funded family planning facilities all over the planet sterilizations are being offered for free.

The United Nations seems absolutely obsessed with population issues. In particular, they seem quite determined to get women in poorer countries to have less children. For example, the March 2009 U.N. Population Division policy brief began with the following statement….

Complete article at: