Obama and his Dems sold Obamacare on the grounds that it meant health care for all. But what they are doing is lowering the standard of health care for all.
Sen. Ted Cruz blasted both political parties for quickly passing a huge $1.1 trillion spending bill that didn’t address GOP objections to Obama’s immigration move, and didn’t give anyone enough time to understand what was in the bill.
Why do nanny statists like Obama & Kamala Harris violate the 4th Amendment? It’s a way to deprive citizens, nonprofits & businesses of constitutional rights before they reach the due process stage. It's big-stick intimidation.
No wonder Justices of the Supreme Court have cited Magna Carta in over 175 cases. It is a foundation for American liberties -- as it has been a foundation of the liberties widely enjoyed throughout the modern Anglosphere.
The thought of a law requiring all federal law enforcement officials to be recorded while on duty may be the new Walter Mitty fantasy for conservatives. O's call to fund cameras has no constiutional support.
Even though the GOP is getting control of both the House and the Senate in January, this "lame duck" session could wreak a great deal of destruction on our country. Conservatives must demand that Capitol Hill Republicans mount a last ditch defense against Obama's unconstitutional amnesty, liberal appointees and spending from now through the swearing-in of the new Congress.
The pilgrims didn't just give thanks for what they had. They gave thanks for the freedom to pursue what they -- with God's help -- might yet achieve.
Responding to hecklers who shouted during his speech that he was deporting families, Obama went off script and made the stunning admission that he changed the law unilaterally.
Those who view this sweeping assertion of presidential authority by Obama through the prism of politics are missing the point. This is not merely a political outrage -- it is a historic offense against the Constitution and public liberty.
“The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted.” -- James Madison
Republicans counter that Obama plans to go further than predecessors in molding immigration policy, effectively rewriting immigration laws without action from Congress and violating the Constitution.
House R's hired constitutional lawyer & left-leaning scholar Jonathan Turley to represent them in their effort to force Obama to abide by the constraints placed on his power in the nation’s founding document.
The GOP not only has a strong political reason to fight Obama on executive abuse, they have a constitutional responsibility, as well.
Based on his subversive actions, by definition Barack Obama is indeed making war against America, and it’s high time Congress responded by declaring their own war.
John Boehner is mulling whether to expand a lawsuit against Obama for exceeding his constitutional power to include action on immigration. Boehner reportedly wants to act quickly if Obama uses exec. action.
Another prominent Dem. has repeatedly argued against the president taking executive action on immigration because “that’s not how our system works. That’s not how our democracy functions. That’s not how our Constitution is written.”
If Loretta Lynch agrees that the Constitution isn't a neutral instrument as between the people and the gov't because it was written to keep the gov't off our backs, she will be an antidote to Obama’s lawbreaking.
Congratulations. The Constitution is battered and on life-support, but had enough in it last night to allow We the People to reject Obama's imperial lawlessness and constitutional lawbreaking. Now limited government constitutional conservatives must hold Republicans to the agenda that got them elected.