Share This Article with a Friend!


Rubio Ready to Admit More Terrorists to USA, Cruz Ready to be Commander-in-Chief

Conservatives are coming together to rebut a bogus attack on Senator Ted Cruz launched by a shadowy Super PAC aligned with establishment Republican presidential candidate Marco Rubio. 

Rubio and his Big Money allies have attacked Cruz for voting for the USA Freedom Act, when 67 senators were in favor of the measure and 32 against, with many of those in opposition saying the bill did not go far enough to protect privacy and curtail federal snooping into the communications of innocent American citizens. 

Bridenstine CruzRubio’s criticism of Cruz puts him (once again) on the same side as establishment Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and in opposition to principled limited government constitutional conservatives such Cruz and Utah’s Sen. Mike Lee, the lead Republican on the bill. 

Conservative Senators James Lankford (a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee) and Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma and Montana’s Steve Daines also voted for the bill, as did many other Senate Republicans. 

Rubio’s vote on the USA Freedom Act also put him squarely on the same side as Senator John McCain, the Muslim Brotherhood’s chief apologists in the Senate, and the other Senators who have generally supported increasing Syrian Muslim “refugee” resettlement, a national security threat that would have been vastly increased had Rubio’s “Gang of Eight” amnesty and open borders bill become law. 

Our friend, principled limited government constitutional conservative Rep. Jim Bridenstine (OK-1) a combat veteran and former Navy pilot released a hard hitting ad nailing Rubio and the phony hit on Cruz by his shadowy supporters. 

"As a Navy pilot, I flew combat missions in Iraq and Afghanistan," Bridenstine tells viewers. "I just watched a despicable ad from one of Marco Rubio's campaign supporters suggesting that Ted Cruz is weak on security." 

"I have watched Ted Cruz boldly stand against President Obama's appeasement of those who threaten our security, from Iran, to [the Islamic State], to Russia," Bridenstine continues. 

As our friend Curt Mills of The Washington Examiner noted, Bridenstine later hits Rubio on immigration and the refugee crisis, saying, "I have seen Ted Cruz stand up to both Obama and Marco Rubio, when they joined forces to provide amnesty without border security. The Rubio amnesty bill would have expanded the U.S. refugee resettlement program."  

Bridenstine’s critique of Rubio’s record mirrors our own view that among the greatest threats – if not THE greatest – national security threat we face is the vast flow of immigrants from radical Muslim terrorist hotspots and other hostile areas of the world. Marco Rubio’s record is one of supporting – indeed expanding – the policies that have allowed over 2.3 million Muslim immigrants to be admitted to the United States since 9/11.  

As we concluded in our columns “Homegrown Muslim Terrorism Fueled By Obama – Bush Immigration System,” “America's Suicidal Muslim Immigration Policies,” “Importing Jihad” and “Why Do We Let These Vipers Into America?” Islam, as it is today practiced by millions of Muslims across the globe, is inimical to the separation of church and state and government based on constitutional liberty. We are in a war of ideas, not just with radical Islamists, but with concepts deeply embedded in Muslim culture. And as long as mass legal (and illegal) immigration from Muslim countries continues unabated we are losing that war. 

There is no escaping the fact that there is no daylight between Marco Rubio’s policy on immigration from Islamist terrorist hotspots and Obama’s policy on immigration from those countries; clearly the policies Senator Rubio has supported and advocated would expand the number of the enemy’s foot soldiers brought into our midst by our own government. 

We urge you to view Rep. Jim Bridenstine’s ad on behalf of Ted Cruz through this link and then ask yourself, “Who is stronger on defending the Constitution, Senator Rubio, who wants to bring millions of Muslim immigrants who oppose the very idea of constitutional liberty into our country, or Senator Cruz, who voted to preserve constitutional liberty by bringing the NSA’s surveillance programs back within strict constitutional bounds?”

Share this

Rubio Cruz On National Security

My view is that both Senator Marco Rubio and Senator Ted Cruz have a solid immigration plan that correlates with our constitution. Both Senators have made the argument that they don't want an influx of Syrian refugees coming into the US at all. The ones that are allowed to come in should be screened by an approved religious sect and by age and gender because most of the Syrian refugees coming into the US can not be vetted so we wouldn't know whether they are terrorists or not. Senator Rubio and Senator Cruz has a comprehensive immigration plan that is a first step toward achieving the strongest border security and enforcement in US history modernizing our legal immigration system to provide strong economic growth and job creation an immigration plan for achieving security readiness. I believe this is the seem strategy for Senator Rubio and Senator Ted Cruz if they win the White House in 2016.

Correcting the record on this comment

Just to correct the record: Rubio's "comprehensive immigration plan" was the Gang of Eight amnesty for illegal aliens bill, which also increased refugee resettlement for such problematic "refugees" as the Syrians who gave cover to the Paris jihadis. Cruz's plan specifically eliminates amnesty for illegal aliens as an option and focuses on preventing terrorists from entering the US.