Andrew Johnson
Senate Judiciary Committee Passes Unconstitutional “Protect Mueller” Bill
- Andrew Johnson
- Appointments Clause of Article II
- Chuck Grassley
- Chuck Schumer
- Department of Justice
- Donald Trump
- James Comey
- Jeff Sessions
- Kamala Harris
- Myers v. United States
- power of removal
- presidential authority
- Robert Mueller investigation
- Rod Rosenstein
- Section 2 of the Constitution
- Senate Judiciary Committee
- separation of powers
- Tenure of Office Act
This isn’t about protecting the integrity of an investigation that long-ago jumped the rails of its original charge to investigate the non-existent collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians. It is merely a Democratic campaign tactic to send a message that the Senate is willing to stand up to President Trump.
The Supreme Court Already Said Trump Can Fire Mueller
The reasoning in Myers v. United States, decided by the Supreme Court in 1926, applies to the President’s ability to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller if he so chooses. Congressional attempts to “protect” Mueller from the President’s clear constitutional authority are intentional efforts to precipitate a constitutional crisis for the benefit of those who think impeaching President Trump will benefit them politically.
Misusing Robert E. Lee
Erasing Robert E. Lee from history – or celebrating him as a symbol of “white nationalism” – is a grave error because it erases one of the greatest symbols of the social compact that reunited the country after the bloodshed and hatred of the Civil War.