Share This Article with a Friend!

The TPP Trade Deal and World Government – Our Perspective

Star Wars Storm Troopers

The establishment media and the DC political elite would like Americans to believe that anyone who expresses concern about the erosion of American sovereignty is some oddball “prepper” who is locked away in a mountaintop redoubt muttering about “one world government” while  stocking up on food and ammunition.

While stocking up on food and ammo doesn’t sound like a bad idea, we don’t have a mountaintop redoubt. But from the perspective of our modest suburban DC office building the continued erosion of American sovereignty – which has accelerated to a dizzying pace during the Barack Obama presidency – can only be stopped in one place: the House Republican Conference.

As our friend Alabama’s principled limited government constitutional conservative Jeff Sessions recently observed, “…the United States is a country—not an economy. And a country’s job is to protect its citizens—whether from military attacks, or from unfair trade policies that threaten the economic well-being of its own people.”

What’s more says Sessions, "Under fast-track, Congress transfers its authority to the executive and agrees to give up several of its most basic powers.

"These concessions include: the power to write legislation, the power to amend legislation, the power to fully consider legislation on the floor, the power to keep debate open until Senate cloture is invoked, and the constitutional requirement that treaties receive a two-thirds vote.

"The latter is especially important since, having been to the closed room to review the secret text of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, it is clear it more closely resembles a treaty than a trade deal.

"In other words, through fast-track, Congress would be pre-clearing a political and economic union before a word of that arrangement has been made available to a single private citizen."

Sessions has made clear a point we have been hammering on in several other contexts, especially the Corker bill on Iran’s nuclear weapons program and Obama’s executive amnesty program: these attacks on American sovereignty can only succeed if Congress cedes its power to Obama, who has made no bones about his preference for multilateral world governance over American sovereignty.

In addition to appointing officials (and Supreme Court Justices) who believe “international law” can and should trump the U.S. Constitution, Obama Administration officials have also embraced a whole series of international treaties that undermine American sovereignty.

The model for these pernicious attacks on American sovereignty is the Law of the Sea Treaty which transfers jurisdiction over the high seas to a new United Nations entity (the Seabed Authority) that would be self-governing without an American veto power over its actions. By imposing taxes on mineral production it will provide an endless stream of revenue for all kinds of international mischief and corruption, mostly at the expense of American companies as Jeffrey B. Gayner, Chairman of Americans for Sovereignty noted in remarks to CPAC back in 2010.

As Senator Sessions has pointed out, the TPP creates a new transnational governance structure known as the Trans-Pacific Partnership Commission. The details of this new governance commission are extremely broad and have the earmarks of a nascent European Union, with many similarities.

"Reviewing the secret text [of the TPP], plus the secret guidance document that accompanies it, reveals that this new transnational commission - chartered with a 'Living Agreement' clause - would have the authority to amend the agreement after its adoption, to add new members, and to issue regulations impacting labor, immigration, environmental, and commercial policy.

"Under this new commission, the Sultan of Brunei would have an equal vote to that of the United States,” said Sessions.

And more to the point, in ratifying the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the Senate would have given up its power to object to any of these future “Living Agreement” provisions, effectively abrogating the U.S. Constitution’s Article I, Section 1 provision that “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States…” and its Article I, Section 8 powers to tax and regulate commerce to name but two of the more obvious erosions of American sovereignty in the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

“The implications of this new Pacific Union are extraordinary and ought to be discussed in full, in public, before Congress even contemplates fast-tracking its creation and pre-surrendering its power to apply the constitutional two-thirds treaty vote,” Sessions wrote to Obama in a letter reported by Breitbart’s Matt Boyle. “In effect, to adopt fast-track is to agree to remove the constitutional protections against the creation of global governance structures before those structures are even made public.

“I would therefore ask that you provide to me the legal and constitutional basis for keeping this information from the public and explain why I cannot share the details of what I have read with the American people. Congress should not even consider fast-tracking the transfer of sovereign power to a transnational structure before the details of that new structure are made fully available for public review.”

After the Senate passed the deal a couple weeks ago, the House could vote as early as this week. We urge CHQ readers to call their Senators and Representative (the Capitol Switchboard is 1-866-220-0044) to demand they vote “NO” on TPA and “NO” on the Trans Pacific Partnership unless and until their provisions guarantee there is no surrender of American sovereignty, the deal is made public and disinterested studies of the economic benefits to American workers and quality of life are conducted.

Share this

What does NAFTA really mean?????

The Liberal Press that is sometimes referred to as the mainstream media refers to NAFTA as the North American Free Trade Agreement.

This morning I was discussing NAFTA and TPP with a new friend I have made.
Steve asked me if I knew what NAFTA really stood for or what does it really mean?

I think this is worth passing along because its funny and because it should be a wake up call.

NAFTA really stands for: Not Another F_ _ _King Trade Agreement !!!

Ha! Ha!

Conservative/Liberal Populism Alliance

In the article I posted earlier I meant to say for the subject: Judeo-Christian Revival and Conservative Populism.

**A good example of Conservative and Liberal Populism can be found in a Senator Sherrod Brown/Elizabeth Warren and Senator Jeff Sessions coalition. Please have a look at the link below.

Dealing away American sovereignty

The Trans-Pacific Partnership would allow globalists to trump American interests

Jesus Revival and CONSERVATIVE Populism are the answer

To Whom it may Concern:

Donald Trump recently suggested that he might decide to run for President and that if he does he will either place a tariff on Multi-Corporations to offset the national deficit and debt or they will decide to re-build the manufacturing base of America that they tore down and dismantled in order to move offshore and exploit workers in third world countries. If he does run and do what he says our country will get back on track and pay off the trillions that we now owe China. Also, China will learn that it exploit the good graces of America if they wish to do business with us.

Rush Limbaugh recently rejected what he called populism as not conservative but in my (IMHO) CONSERVATIVE POPULISM is the very foundation of our democratic republic because unlike Corporatism and Pure Capitalism it encourage "Free Enterprise" instead of MANAGED TRADE. CONSERVATIVE POPULISM stands on the Constitution as the foundation for our Republic. Globalism of multi-corporations does not. We don't even have fair trade today.

Our country definitely needs a revival in the Judeo Christian principles that has made her great. Not only that she needs a revival of Conservative Populism which will safeguard our way of life, our homes, our children, our prosperity and our freedoms based upon the precepts the founders intended in our constitution.

On the flip side of this coin are Liberal Populists. Both Conservative and Liberal Populist can be counted on to do what is right on most issues but then on others Conservative Populism must depend upon a coalition of Social Conservative/evangelicals to help defeat the Global agenda of the Oligarchs. I know Rush Limbaugh means well and he has supported Conservative Populism in the past perhaps without realizing it but in this instance I disagree with him about Populism not being Conservative.

True Conservatives who believe in the constitution are Conservative Populists and we must now align ourselves with liberal populists in order to defeat the U.S.Chamber of Commerce and RINO Republicans and Elitist Democrats.

On June the 16th Trump will announce his decision and if he decides to run for president I encourage all Americans to consider him as a potential Presidential possibility.


Clinton Berry