top of page
Search
CHQ Staff

Call to Action: Oppose Anti-Religious Attorney Bradley Garcia for DC Court of Appeals

Our friends at First Liberty just alerted us that Biden has renominated Bradley Garcia, a fiercely anti-religious lawyer, to sit on the all-important DC Court of Appeals.

According to First Liberty’s Maya Noronha, Biden nominated Garcia to be a federal appellate judge, despite the nominee’s admission that he chose to take cases and argued against religious freedom. Last year, Garcia’s nomination died at the end of the year with a scheduled Senate confirmation vote. But Garcia is now back into the pipeline for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, and with him, a threat to religious liberty.


Garcia had challenged the First Amendment rights of religious schools to freely make employment decisions in the case Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrisey-Berru. If Garcia’s legal theories had been adopted by the court, the door would have opened wide for interference with the independent employment decisions of religious schools.


Garcia’s position was so extreme that seven justices—including liberal Justices Elena Kagan and Stephen Breyer—rejected his legal arguments in the Court’s 7-2 decision.


At Garcia’s confirmation hearing last July, Garcia was called to answer about his role in that case. Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana said, “You were arguing against the Catholic elementary school and against, at least from their point of view, their religious freedom.” Garcia admitted he took a stance against religious freedom, saying, “I think that’s fair.”


After that disturbing exchange, other U.S. Senators sounded the alarm about the nominee. Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Charles Grassley of Iowa raised “concerns about his judicial philosophy, including his approach to religious liberty.” The Senator added, “He litigated against Catholic elementary schools, arguing that federal courts have the power to intervene in employment disputes involving teachers responsible for instructing students in the faith.”


Subsequently, 10 Senate Judiciary Committee members voted against sending the nominee to the floor. Senate Majority Leader Schumer never scheduled Garcia for a vote by the full Senate during the last session of Congress. President Biden’s renomination tees up Garcia for a second chance for a confirmation vote.


A seat on the D.C. Circuit has the potential to put Garcia in the position to decide major cases on religious liberty. Remember, it is often considered the second highest court in the country after the Supreme Court. If confirmed, it may put Garcia on a path to a later U.S. Supreme Court nomination. More current and recent U.S. Supreme Court Justices have previously served on the D.C. Circuit than any other court.


In addition to filing an amicus brief in the Our Lady of Guadalupe case pointing out the errors in Garcia’s arguments, First Liberty has successfully provided direct representation of religious schools such as Academia del Perpetuo Socorro and Academia San José in Puerto Rico. The Constitution protects the right of religious schools and institutions have the right to freely choose who will preach their religious message, teach their religious doctrine and lead our future generations according to their religious tradition.


Religious schools, ministries, houses of worship and individual Americans are confronting increasing attacks on their rights. Now, more than ever, our federal courts need judges who are committed the Constitution, the rule of law and the protection of our freedoms—including religious liberty. As the Senate ramps up confirmations and hearings in the next several weeks, we are counting on First Liberty to provide us with the facts if any of President Biden’s nominees have a radical or unacceptable record. To support First Liberty in the fight to protect our religious liberty click here.


The Capitol Switchboard is (202) 224-3121 we urge CHQ readers and friends to call their Senators, tell them that you oppose confirming Bradley Garcia, because it would be placing a lawyer who has complete contempt for the First Amendment on the DC Court of Appeals, generally thought to be the gateway to the Supreme Court because it handles many of the most high-profile appeals cases.



  • Joe Biden nominees

  • Freedom of religion

  • First Amendment

  • right of conscience

  • Bradley Garcia

  • DC Court of Appeals

  • First Liberty

  • Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrisey-Berru

381 views3 comments

Recent Posts

See All

3 Comments


startrek3010
Feb 02, 2023

Elections do have consequences. The GOP blew the Senate election. So we're going to be stuck with idiots like this for the next two years. The Republican Party has failed us miserably for decades. Look at the guy they handed the White House to after totally bailing on President Trump.

Like

startrek3010
Feb 02, 2023

Hopefully, this guy at least knows what the Second and Fifth articles of the Constitution are . . . !

Like

James Bryson
James Bryson
Feb 02, 2023

A party of moral decadence nominating tools of moral decadence.

God help us...help ourselves.

Like
bottom of page