top of page
Search

Can the WHO Treaty Really Supersede American Sovereignty?

The World Health Organization has big targets in its sights. That includes you.

 

“He has a property very dear to him in the safety and liberty of his person.” James Madison 1792


In Madison’s words, of all our property rights, those we hold over our own body may be the most “dear.”

 

Yet with the introduction of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in 2020, Americans allowed those rights to be tyrannized. Forced masking, medical procedures, vaccinations, and human separation erased any sense of personal autonomy.

 

Now many fear loss of sovereignty to the WHO as the body advances two documents intended to “sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals and ecosystems.”1 Management of those three entities would require oversight of every living creature on earth.

 

The  documents consist of 1. amendments to the existing International Health Regulations (IHR) and 2.  a new agreement called the Pandemic Treaty but also referred to as a Covenant, and an Agreement.

 

IHR –

 

According to the WHO, “The IHR are an instrument of international law that is legally-binding on 196 countries, including the 194 WHO Member States.”2  (Italics are my emphasis.)

 

Physician Meryl Nass has spent months revealing the contents of the draft documents.

 

The IHR drafts changed the regulations from “non-binding” recommendations to binding on member states.

 

Implementation was based on respect for human rights and freedoms. Now based on equity, inclusivity, social and economic development (In other words, the woke goals of DEI and ESG.)

 

The drafters agree the regulations may “interfere with livelihoods”, (think business closings) and “human rights. (Can include vaccine mandates, travel restrictions.)

 

Once agreed, the WHO decides when and how these amendments apply.

 

Pandemic Treaty –

 

As Nass points out, the Pandemic Treaty is primarily a drug enforcement and censorship document.  Under the draft rules the WHO:

 

Decides what is dis or misinformation, then through the member states and media can exercise global control of medical information.

 

Can create, maintain, and share a medical and personal database on all citizens.

 

Can mandate which drugs are to be used and which are restricted.

 

Can tell nations how much they must pay to address health emergencies.

 

Creates a Bio Hub System for the creation, storing and sharing of lab generated pathogens that can lead to pandemics or health emergencies.3  (This is the stockpiling and global sharing of the same gain of function research that led to the COVID “pandemic.” High containment labs already have a poor history of lab leaks.)4

 

Can the WHO supersede our Constitutional protections?

 

The Supremacy Clause, Article VI, Clause 2 of our Constitution states that document alone is the Supreme Law of the Land. No judge, treaty, nation, congress, or even the Supreme Court has supremacy over the U.S. Constitution. The Clause further explains that all treaties made under the Authority of the United States, and Judges in every state, State laws and Constitutions all must act in Pursuance of our Constitution. 5

 

Chief Justice John Marshall strengthened the point when he said in Marbury v. Madison, (1803) “A Law repugnant to the Constitution is void.”  With that decision he upheld the Constitution’s supremacy and voided a law approved by Congress and signed by the President.

 

Neither a treaty nor amendment changes can contradict and take precedence over our Constitution. That does not mean we as a nation cannot surrender or allow ourselves to be stripped of those protections.

 

The current administration and many judges have shown disdain for the letter of the Constitution.6  Should a U.S. president sign an Executive Agreement, or Congress ratify the WHO Pandemic Treaty, those rules would soon appear in federal agency guidelines for medical associations, hospitals, health professional, and the public to follow.

 

Americans have followed -

 

Thomas Hobbs in his 1651 document, Leviathan, noted how kings during the English Civil War used terror of punishment or death to control the people.7 

 

By March of 2020, Americans were terrified. That month the Imperial College of London predicted 2.2 million Americans could die from COVID, while Anthony Fauci claimed up to 200,000 U.S. lives would be lost. Fear provoking headlines reminded of the “deadly” 1918 Spanish Flu.8

 

In its COVID response the administration ordered businesses to close, bankrupting many. Others  were ordered to lockdown and quarantine, and relatives were left frightened in hospital waiting rooms unable to visit their dying loved ones. Supply chains were ruptured, store shelves vacant, and the government added trillions in debt sinking a soaring economy, while millions left the workforce, many never to return.  Not one of these “emergency” actions was constitutional or  justified.

 

In her work, The Origins of Totalitarianism, Hannah Arendt explains how fear and loneliness are major factors in welding a compliant populace.9 The federal, state, and often local responses to COVID incorporated loneliness, fear, and the absolute terror of dying; every quality required to gain obedience. That obedience paid dividends for those in control.

 

Despite knowing Pfizer’s COVID vaccine was in early trials when released,  despite Pfizer abruptly and prematurely ending the trials, and despite the public knowing little about the true effects of the drug, by December 2020, 1 year from its FDA approval, 500 million doses of the vaccine had been delivered in the U.S.10 It took 2 lawsuits and more than a year to uncover the CDC’s own data showing the product’s serious dangers.11

 

How the Administration Codifies Totalitarianism

 

The federal process for moving to totalitarian control was unnervingly simple.

 

The President penned executive orders to federal agencies who in turn revised then forwarded their official guidelines.  In the case of HHS, the new rules were disbursed to health facilities, medical associations, and selective media. Hospitals followed the “official” guideline to protect themselves from lawsuits and assure continuance of Medicare reimbursements. Doctors listened to established “experts”, including the CDC, FDA, and AMA. For noncompliance health professionals risked loss of hospital privileges, board certification, reputation, and livelihoods. As one doctor told me, “When it comes to vaccines, we bury our heads in the sand.”

 

Opposition was met by a unified media hate cry, Homeland Security-elevated censorship,  manipulated pro-vax and anti-alternative treatment studies, and a newly birthed fact-checking industry whose “findings” aligned with the official message.

 

Today our “person” rights face even greater threats. The net of fear is already being cast. The WHO recently warned that disease “X” is coming and wields 20 times COVID’s fatality rate.12  As if on cue, the CDC then planted the seeds of the “deadliest U.S. bird flu outbreak in history.”13

 

The question is, how many will fall into the terror trap a second time, and how many will just say “no.”

 

Actions –

 

It’s not too late to stop the WHO. They are already meeting growing resistance.  We know our current president supports the globalist moves. That’s why it is important to learn what is happening and share your information with all you know. Silence leads to more compliance and an amped up repeat of the COVID dictates.

 

Learn the facts. Legacy media and fact-checkers often display globalist sympathies and omit or misrepresent the WHO’s actions.  Up to date information and documentation are available here and here.

 

Repeal state level Emergency Powers Legislation.   During the pandemic scare, federal, state, and local officials abused their emergency powers enabling widespread panic, loss of mobility, personal and financial hardships. Here are instructions to repeal these powers in your state and a sample bill.

 

Restore state sovereignty. As citizens you can work with your legislature to nullify any past or proposed unconstitutional federal laws in your state. Tennessee Citizens for State Sovereignty (TNCSS) is leading the way on this initiative. 

 

The U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause –

 

“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”


TruthMonster John Anthony is a national speaker, researcher, founder of the Sustainable Freedom Lab, and an expert on HUD and property rights infringements click here to subscribe to his must-read Substack.

 

Sources:



  • World Health Organization funding

  • Global governance

  • H.R. 2

  • World Health Organization

  • Centers for Disease Control

  • Digital Health Passports

  • Global Pandemic Treaty

  • Reggie Littlejohn

  • Treaty ratification

  • Biden administration

  • American sovereignty

  • Sovereignty coalition

  • American sovereignty declaration

  • Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus

251 views9 comments

9 komentářů


rosie16
rosie16
(24. 4.)

Not only should we be out of the WHO; we should be out of the UN. Once we connected ourselves to that entangling alliance with the worst governments on the planet, it was already too late. We should have listened to Washington...the man, not the sewer in DC.

To se mi líbí

thomas henry
thomas henry
(23. 4.)

The WHO Treaty raises crucial concerns about potential overreach, but its measures could support US sovereignty by bolstering public health capacity and preparedness. A balanced approach is necessary to maximize its effectiveness.

New Jersey District Court Protective Order

Domestic Violence Central Registry New Jersey

To se mi líbí

Donald King
Donald King
(23. 4.)

The current administration acts on behalf of the U.N., not the United States.

To se mi líbí

Van Snyder
Van Snyder
(22. 4.)

It's not obvious that treaties cannot supersede our sovereignty.


Article VI was intended to protect the only treaty in existence at the time the Constitution was written: The 1783 Treaty of Paris that ended the Revolutionary War. The North Carolina Constitutional Ratification Convention was worried about Article VI proclaiming that treaties are the "supreme law of the land." Their ratification letter asked for an amendment, but they didn't get one:


"No treaties which shall be directly opposed to the existing laws of the United States in Congress assembled shall be valid until such laws shall be repealed, or made conformable to such treaty; nor shall any treaty be valid which is contradictory to the Constitution of the United States."


Supreme…


To se mi líbí

Yes, it can, and probably will, succeed because neither political party will oppose it. American voters haver failed us every election cycle since at least 1964.

To se mi líbí
rosie16
rosie16
(24. 4.)
Reakce na

Not all voters....just the usual suspects who have traded their and our freedom for free stuff.

To se mi líbí
bottom of page