top of page
Search

Is AG Bill Barr MAGA Or Not?

In an appointment order released Tuesday, first reported by the Associated Press, Attorney

General William Barr appointed Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham as special counsel to continue his investigation into the origins of the FBI’s phony charges tying President Trump and his campaign to claims of Russian interference in the 2016 election.


According to the AP report, Mr. Barr said that Durham is authorized "to investigate whether any federal official, employee or any person or entity violated the law in connection with the intelligence, counter-intelligence or law enforcement activities."


This would appear to be great news because Barr's decision to elevate him as a special counsel, done two weeks prior to the election, gives Durham an extra layer of protection -- he can't easily be fired in a Justice Department if President Trump’s challenges to the fraudulent election fail and a Biden administration tries to quash the Durham investigation.


However, at the same time Attorney General Barr acted to preserve the investigation into what amounted to an attempted coup by the outgoing Obama administration, he appeared to step on attempts to prove that the widespread vote fraud in the 2020 election could change the outcome of the election.


"To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have affected a different outcome in the election," Barr told the Associated Press.


Barr specifically singled out the extensive evidence that vote tabulation machines had been tampered with in a way to skew the election towards Joe Biden.


"There's been one assertion that would be systemic fraud and that would be the claim that machines were programmed essentially to skew the election results. And the DHS and DOJ have looked into that, and so far, we haven't seen anything to substantiate that," Barr said according to the AP report.


Barr told the AP that, to date, the department's investigations have been more isolated instances of potential fraud rather than anything indicating a systemic failure in how the election was carried out.


"Most claims of fraud are very particularized to a particular set of circumstances or actors or conduct," Barr said. "They are not systemic allegations and. And those have been run down; they are being run down," Barr said. "Some have been broad and potentially cover a few thousand votes. They have been followed up on."


Most media and social media reported that Barr said the FBI and DOJ had concluded there was no election fraud – and President Trump’s legal team was quick to respond. A joint statement issued by Trump lawyers Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis said:


“With all due respect to the Attorney General, there hasn’t been any semblance of a Department of Justice investigation. We have gathered ample evidence of illegal voting in at least six states, which they have not examined. We have many witnesses swearing under oath they saw crimes being committed in connection with voter fraud. As far as we know, not a single one has been interviewed by the DOJ. The Justice Department also hasn’t audited any voting machines or used their subpoena powers to determine the truth.


“Nonetheless, we will continue our pursuit of the truth through the judicial system and state legislatures and continue toward the Constitution’s mandate and ensuring that every legal vote is counted and every illegal vote is not. Again, with the greatest respect to the Attorney General, his opinion appears to be without any knowledge or investigation of the substantial irregularities and evidence of systemic fraud.”


But the headlines did not capture what Attorney General Barr actually said. What he said was the Department will continue to receive and vigorously pursue all specific and credible allegations of fraud as expeditiously as possible, but that to-date no systemic fraud had been uncovered.


The problem with Barr’s comments is not that there wasn’t systemic election fraud or that evidence of it does not exist, it is that the FBI hasn’t been looking for it and that Mr. Barr seems to be waiting around for someone to bring him the proof all wrapped-up in a neat little package.


That is not how the FBI and the voting rights section of the DOJ is supposed to operate. They are expected to be proactive and to go out and look for election violations when there is evidence of voting rights violations. Imagine for a moment that the massive evidence of election fraud was to the disadvantage of a minority candidate for Senator and vote fraud deprived an African American candidate – say like Republican John James of Michigan -- of office. One would think the FBI and DOJ would be on that like they were on the specious “noose” in Bubba Wallace’s NASCAR garage.


For some reason, the Attorney General seems determined to give with one hand on the Durham investigation and take with the other on the systemic vote fraud non-investigation. We urge CHQ readers and friends to call or contact Attorney General Barr at the Department of Justice. Tell him there’s plenty of evidence of systemic election fraud here How The Democrats Stole The Election From President Trump (Part 1 of 2) and here How The Democrats Stole The Election From President Trump (Part 2 of 2) all he has to do is ask to see it.


  • 2020 Election

  • Joe Biden

  • Hunter Biden

  • Attorney General William Barr

  • John Durham

  • voter fraud

  • Donald Trump

  • Department of Homeland Security

  • Rudy Giuliani

  • Jenna Ellis

  • FBI

  • Systemic fraud

1,118 views5 comments

5 Comments


I fear Bill Barr has just been there to stall the president on some issues. Appointing Durham was one of the steps in the stalling because if Biden is elected we will never hear anything from Durham. He has just been there to draw a paycheck. They are both just members of the swamp that is so deep and wide that the largest army in the world could never empty it. This will eventually lead to the failure of the republic experiment to be replaced by, take your choice. What a shame!!

Like

With the evidence present and presentable of voter fraud and the Attorney General does not see that there is an investigation into this evidence , especially after the past several years of illegal activities by Democrats and supporters against our President ( activities ALREADY PROVEN to be illegal lies ) might suggest that said AG might be on the receiving end of some of George Soros ' payoff money !! Just how deep does the " bought & paid for " officials go ??

Like

wardschuler
wardschuler
Dec 03, 2020

DOJ-AG is not doing a job for justice & has all the stench of a cowardly support for dems !

Like

The fact bein that Barr is not in the same position as Trump who cannot be prosecuted while in office, Barr is forced to tell the truth or say nothing, because he could loose his law license and go to jail for actually lying, now Trump might pardon Barr but he could not give him his law license back and no state would because a open lie is not tolerated in any law circle, maybe misleading information but not outright lies. Now so many have said no Federal investigations have been done into the voter fraud allegations when in fact almost 2700 investigation have been completed and 5 involving machines which supposedly changed Trump votes to Biden which a h…

Like

Chuck Anziulewicz
Chuck Anziulewicz
Dec 03, 2020

So far the Trump Campaign is batting virtually ZERO in court. It's not that anyone's unwilling to embrace the possibility of voter fraud, but Trump's supporters so far have done a p*ss-poor job of making their cases. There's a lot of hearsay about sacks of ballots being set on fire, or showing up seemingly out of nowhere, or ballot center windows being boarded up, or North Korean boats delivering fake ballots by way of harbors in Maine (according to Roger Stone), or voting machines being manipulated by China and Iran. Fine, let the evidence be presented in court. Let witnesses testify under oath. I'm sure you think there is no time frame too long to let this all drag out.…

Like
bottom of page